On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:03:56PM -0400, Justin Edward Muniz wrote: > > > > I think the interface to pkgng and freebsd-update are still > > interesting; at least more worthwhile than the kernel configuration > > one. > > > > I think the pkgng one has the edge, since packages are updated far > > more often than base, and it's easier to track base. > > > > Now you are at a stage where you should make your own decision; which > > one looks the most interesting to you? Once you decide on an area of > > interest, you can just start hacking :) > > > > Chris > > > > > That's good to hear. > > I am sure that you are right, a pkgng GUI would probably see more use in > general. I am definitely close to making my decision, but this thread has > been so much help, I am glad for the insight. > > The coding is what I look forward to the most :D
imho a pkgng frontend should be done via packagekit, just write a pkgng backend for packagekit and you will gain for FreeBSD a KDE frontend and a GTK frontend. That said any frontend at convenience to contributor will be anyway good :) regards, Bapt
pgpNCIZpQMvf5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
