Hello,
I have been taking a look at a few syscalls in /usr/src/sys/kern/ and
always find that in their actuall c definition the function names are
preprended by a sys_. Take for example the fork system call which
is found in /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c

int
sys_fork(struct thread *td, struct fork_args *uap)
...

Now when I write a program from userland, that makes use of the 
fork system call, then if call it as:

fork();

All the syscall are part of libc, which is usually defined in 
/usr/src/lib/libc/

Since the system calls are already defined in the kernel sources, they 
no longer need to be defined in /usr/src/lib/libc/. This is the reason 
why one can only find the manpages and no c files in 
/usr/src/lib/libc/sys?
At least this is how my thinking goes.

Now, when the syscalls in the kernel sources are all defined as sys_xxx 
but are invoked as xxx and the c headers also show syscall prototypes 
without any prepended sys. How does the actual user-, kernelland 
move happen? In other words, why do I invoke fork() as fork() and
not as sys_fork()?

Or is there something that I missed?


Clarification on that point is highly welcome.

Thanks
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to