On 7/12/13 10:01 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
On 10 July 2013 19:07, Vincent Hoffman <vi...@unsane.co.uk> wrote:
There was some work on something similar at one point, not sure what
came of it.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-September/020164.html
The code referenced there has been used in production since 2005 or
so, and is based on an earlier implementation for FreeBSD 4.x that
dates to 2000.  Despite some shortcomings in the implementation it has
proved quite reliable in practice.

It hasn't made it into the tree yet for reasons raised in this thread.
  The primary issue is that it allocates mbufs in the packet sending
path, and so relies on a number of kernel subsystems to be in a
consistent state.  It doesn't use the stack, routing table, or driver
interrupt interfaces though.  It could likely be made committable with
a relatively small effort to switch to preallocating an mbuf+cluster
or two at configuration time.

More information is on the FreeBSD wiki, at https://wiki.freebsd.org/Netdump

I would say this is one of the features I've looked for a LOT over the last 20 years.

_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to