In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mitsuru IWASAKI さんいわく
:
>> >I've update the patch based on some comments so far and added wmpm
>> >(actually ACPI support for wmapm which is utility for WindowMaker)
>> >ports files as a example.
>> >
>> >http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/power-20010113.tar.gz
>>
>> What about treating it as a part of ioctl in existing device, then
>> make symbolic link to a generalzed name,instead of consuming new
>> major number?
>
>Does `existing device' mean APM or ACPI?
Yes .
>We don't know which power management system is enabled on the actual
>system, so it's impossible. We need one mandatory device for PM to be
>generalized. I think the opposite way is more reasonable.
Why? Is it bad to check whether the device is available or not in rc?
Takanori Watanabe
<a href="http://www.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp/~takawata/key.html">
Public Key</a>
Key fingerprint = 2C 51 E2 78 2C E1 C5 2D 0F F1 20 A3 11 3A 62 2A
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
