At 10:58 PM 01/24/2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>In article 
><local.mail.freebsd-hackers/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>you write:
> >
> >>
> >> >    I'll look into the Linux driver, however, and see if it has anything
> >> > useful in it. Historically the Linux Pro/100+ driver has totally 
> sucked and
> >> > was chalk-full of magic numbers being anded and ored.
> >>
> >>That's "chock full", and you're confusing the Becker driver (bad) with
> >>the Intel-supplied driver (slightly less bad).
> >
> >
> >The intel driver seems to cover all the bases and has some nice glue
> >routines for determining the part and features available.
> >
> >I havent tested it under load, but I wonder if intel would consider
> >supporting it if someone ported it over to freebsd? they have drivers for
> >just about every other major OS except BSD. it would be nice if the driver
> >was updated BEFORE cards and MBs that dont work started showing up on the
> >loading dock. Every time I get a shipment we have to hold our breath until
> >we try one out.
>
>The documentation is available, if you want to (or have to) sign an
>NDA.  People who have the NDA documentation are perfectly capable of
>writing a driver, although the source can't be released.  It would
>probably be possible to release a binary driver, but why do anything
>to help Intel, given their unhelpful attitude?

If they have a published, freely distributable driver for linux. why would 
you have to sign an NDA to port it to FreeBSD?

I dont think so. Not anymore anyway. Thats the whole point of this thread...

Dennis



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to