Re: Setting memory allocators for library functions.

[Daniel C. Sobral]

Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> 
> > > None of these solutions are portable, however;
> > Well, no, but the sole available definition of "portable" says that it is
> > "portable" to assume that all the memory malloc can return is really
> > available.
> 
> Show me a modern OS (excluding real-time and/or embedded OSes) that
> makes this guarantee.

Solaris and AIX (on AIX this is optional on a global or per-application
level).

-- 
Daniel C. Sobral                        (8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

        Acabou o hipismo-arte. Mas a desculpa brasileira mais ouvida em Sydney
e' que nao tem mais cavalo bobo por ai'.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message