:
:In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Dillon writes:
:>    I just had an idea... allow the kernel security level to be specified
:>    for a jailed environment.  Add a 'securelevel' field to the jail
:>    structure and bump the API rev.
:
:That would be trivial to do, but I thought that securelevels were
:demed "nice proof of concept but not the right way" ?
:
:--
:Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20

    Oh, also we would enforce increasing the secure level only... so when
    you run a jail the minimum securelevel is the current securelevel.  And
    the global sysctl securelevel would still exist and override everything,
    but now it is possible to leave it at -1 and run most system services
    (including sshd) at a higher secure level inside a jail, leaving only
    the init-run getty's running at securelevel -1.

                                                -Matt


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to