On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > I agree totally. This should have been done ages ago, I've been burned on > it a few times, but never badly enough to go fix it. I've committed this - I'll let Matt do the MFC when he feels ready. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- [Patch?] signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) is against SUSv2 Cejka Rudolf
- Re: [Patch?] signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) is against SUSv2 Cejka Rudolf
- Re: [Patch?] signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) is against SUSv2 Terry Lambert
- Re: [Patch?] signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) is against SUSv2 Cejka Rudolf
- signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) patch solving SUSv2 compat... Matt Dillon
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) patch solving SUSv... Peter Wemm
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) patch solving ... David Malone
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) patch sol... Cejka Rudolf
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) patch... Matt Dillon
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) p... David Malone
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) p... Terry Lambert
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) p... Matt Dillon
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) p... Terry Lambert
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) p... Matt Dillon
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) p... Terry Lambert
- Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) patch... Matt Dillon
- Re: [Patch?] signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN) is against SU... Terry Lambert