Isn't this what 'camcontrol rescan' is for?
G'luck,
Peter
--
This sentence contains exactly threee erors.
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:38:53AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> But the unit numbers can and do recycle.
>
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:39:09PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote:
> > >
> > > Here is the code for a scsi removable media drive. If this is to become a
> > > module, the cam/scsi attachment must be removed. I have tried calling
> > > cam_sim_free() and xpt_bus_deregister() but when the module is reloaded, the
> > > cam system assigns the next higher minor device number, and then crashes
> > > when accessed. Any ideas here how to reset cam to a state where it knows
> > > nothing about the device?
> >
> > I might be dead wrong here, but I think the different *types* of SCSI
> > devices are compiled statically in the kernel, and not intended to be
> > unloaded. See the kernel options 'da', 'cd', 'pass' et al.
> >
> > What I mean is that what you are trying to do might not be even possible,
> > at least with the current state of the CAM code. And of course, I may
> > have completely misunderstood what you are trying to do :)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
