On Saturday, July 14, 2001, at 11:23 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> The correct answer to the level of accuracy you quote is:
> 137581029243568295877658.36934931
>
> Both are correct to about 15 sig figs, which is about what the precision
> of IEEE double precision arithmetic is supposed to be.
This would explain why the alpha zero's out the last places before
the decimal. The problem is here is we need to emulate the
Linux performance exactly regardless if it is correct :(
- JimP
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> So I have stumbled across a linux emulation bug in freebsd. Below
>> is the program that returns different results based on FreeBSD,
>> Linux or Linux emulation under FreeBSD.
>>
>> Running natively under FreeBSD:
>>
>> x = 53.27850000
>> exp(x) = 137581029243568449912832.00000000
>>
>> Running natively under Linux:
>>
>> x = 53.278500
>> exp(x) = 137581029243568449912832.000000
>>
>> Running under FreeBSD in Linux emulation mode:
>>
>> x = 53.27850000
>> exp(x) = 137581029243567812378624.00000000
>>
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> #include <math.h>
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>>
>> int main (int argc, char **argv) {
>> double x = 53.278500;
>>
>> printf ("x = %8lf\n", x);
>> printf ("exp(x) = %8lf\n", exp(x));
>>
>> exit (0);
>> }
>>
>> There are only two shared libaries in common (libc and libm) and
>> both are the same on FreeBSD (in /compat/linux) and Linux.
>>
>> So any ideas on where the program is going wrong?
>>
>> - JimP
>> --
>> --- @(#) $Id: dot.signature,v 1.10 2001/05/17 23:38:49 Jim.Pirzyk Exp $
>> __o [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> _'\<,_ Senior Systems Engineer, Walt Disney Feature Animation
>> (*)/ (*)
>>
>> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
> --
> Stephen Montgomery-Smith
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
