On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 06:34:55PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> People are proposing to do various hacks to existing utilities and
> applications without having any real idea of the impact of their ideas,
> or even in some cases what semantic sense these hacks have.
For what it's worth, my original thought was that {ping,traceroute}
utilitites would simply take the "host part" of an URL and do their
normal activities.
Since that post I've gotten at least 5 other ideas of what might be
possible.
--
Leo Bicknell - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440
Read TMBG List - [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.tmbg.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Chris Costello
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Leo Bicknell
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Chris Costello
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Leo Bicknell
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. David O'Brien
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Steve Roome
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. David O'Brien
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Richard Hodges
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Hroi Sigurdsson
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Bruce A. Mah
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Leo Bicknell
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Matthew D. Fuller
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Richard Hodges
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Michael Sinz
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Sansonetti Laurent
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Charlie Root
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Michael Sinz
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Michael Sinz
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Kenneth P. Stox
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Michael Sinz
- Re: Should URL's be pervasive. Charlie Root

