Nobody ever said we couldn't. The word you're looking for is "won't"
and if you want to know why, search the mailing list archives because
it's all been discussed before and there's no point in going over old
ground.
- Jordan
From: "David Xu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:48:14 +0800
>
> I'm confused why Open and NetBSD both have XF4 installed, while we can't. why!
>
> David Xu
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Alexander Langer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Robert Withrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Robert Withrow"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jordan Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4
>
>
> >
> > On 18-Sep-2001 Alexander Langer wrote:
> > > > The previous suggestion (have a generic XFree86 port) is a) hacky, but b)
> > > > workable in the current package framework I suspect..
> > >
> > > Yes, would be a nice workaround.
> > >
> > > I don't use packages, though :)
> >
> > I'm forced not to if I'm using a machine which needs X4..
> >
> > Usually for a fresh install I use packages since it gets a working machine
> > quicker :)
> >
> > ---
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
