On 30-Sep-2001 Bart Kus wrote: > Right now, I use for() as a timing loop. I calibrate it on program start > and can then get very precise timing. There are, of course, the > intermittent > interruptions of the multitasker. So this solution is not ideal by any > means. In fact, the for() loop approach is really meant for the DOS port of > this software. I'm wondering if there is any way I can access a more > precise > interrupt-driven (or blocking) timing source. I know I can do a select() > with supposedly microsecond accuracy, but I doubt that it is in fact that > accurate in practice (doesn't the kernel only use a 100Hz clock or > something?). Is there any way to get at the system timers on the > motherboard? Those can provide precise timing, no?
I suspect the only way you could achieve this in FreeBSD at the moment is to write a kernel driver. That way you can disable interrupts while you frob your board.. (And get quick access when you need it). --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
