Leo Bicknell wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:51:29PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > That looks very promising indeed. Hrmm. I should go see if NetBSD has fix ed > > this. I guess having timeval be different sizes on different archs is a bi t of > > a pain. :( Perhaps it should use uint32_t? Or perhaps struct tsp should u se > > its own variant of timeval with uint32_t or some such. Ugh. > > If timeval is different sizes on different archs then I would > recomend the work be done take it to 64 bits, not 32. It fixes a > problem in about 30 years. :-)
Unfortunately, it isn't our on-the-wire protocol to modify. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message