On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 06:35:48PM +0000, John Vinters wrote: > > I've (reasonably) recently installed 4.3-Release on a system running > Samba and a few light telnet apps, and noticed similar performance > problems. > > The SMB sessions would randomly change speed, and telnet sessions would > suffer from occasional "hesitation" (this is on a Dual PIII-700 MHz > machine with 1 Gb of RAM, which is currently very lightly loaded). > > I managed to track the problem down to the duplex settings on both the > Ethernet cards (AT-2500 TX, Realtek 8139 based, AFAIK) and the 10/100 > Switch. Forcing both the cards and the switch to particular settings > cured the problem, and lead to a massive performance increase. > > FTP seems to be particularly badly affected by the constant collisions > (causing backoff). The problem can be tricky to find as the switch > wasn't perceptably showing collisions on the collision LED, but viewing > the switch stats showed a different story! > > I've noticed similar problems with Linux and certain cards (it was a > while ago). > > > John Vinters > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
Well, I am seeing dismal ftp performance on my 4.x boxes. I have a network of 4 machines, three of which are running -STABLE from Nov 22. The other machine is running NetBSD 1.5.2 Release. One of the FreeBSD machines has a base 10 cards in it and has reasonable performace with ftp transfer rates around 1.1Megs/sec. The NetBSD machine is a sparcstation 10 with an onboard intel base 10 adapter, and it too sees reasonable ftp performance. The other two -STABLE boxes have 100tx cards in them. One is a Linksys LNE100TX, and the other is an intel Pro 10/100B/100+. The hub for this network is an 8 port SOHOware autosensing affair. Both of the 100 cards auto-negotiate to 100tx half-duplex. I can get appoximately 1.5Megs/sec out of them using ftp. I have tried swapping cables, swapping ports, and replacing the hub with a crossover cable and manually configuring the cards for either full or half duplex operation. None of these steps makes any difference at all. I can reliably duplicate my transfer speeds on a 600 meg file with a std. deviation of less than a half a second no matter what network configuration I use. My next step will be to try some different NICs, but I don't have anything here that is 100tx based to swap with. I have gotten proper transfer rates out of these machines in the past, but I don't remember if the network cards have changed since then. I rarely move large files around at all, and so only looked into this as a curiosity when seeing this thread. I also intend to try some NFS mounts out to see if this is a protocol issue or not. Josh To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message