Hi, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > An interesting proposition. However, you might find it even easier to > do a Hitachi HD64570-based board. It should be much easier to modify > the sr driver to work with it than to write a new one from scratch. >
As other people already has said, it don't looks like that Hitachi is in it for the long run, and it's not for higher speeds, I would like to also be able to do E3/T3..... And anyway, the HD64570 is not a PCI chip, requering additional chips to interface to the PCI bus. Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > We already have drivers in the tree for the infinion "MUNICHX" chip, > when used with a FALC frontend. We also have drivers for the MUSYCC > from Conexant. > The PEB20321 (Munich32) supported in that driver is a channelized version, that not really what people are asking for.... It's also low speed, and support only one interface if used unchannelized. I don't remember about the Conexant chip, but I think it's channelized too. Paul, do you know how close the PEB20321 and PEB20534 are from a programming point if view ? But the FALC phy might be good for the T1/E1 versions. I have look around for sync serial controllers, but keep comming back to the PEB20534, I think that the best chip available for the job. Regards, Soren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
