* Dan Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011204 06:26] wrote:
>
> There are already cancellation tests when resuming threads
> whose contexts are not saved as a result of a signal interrupt
> (ctxtype != CTX_UC). You shouldn't test for cancellation when
> ctxtype == CTX_UC because you are running on the scheduler
> stack, not the threads stack.
That makes sense, but why?
> You also have a bug in the
> way you changed the check for cancellation flags.
What?
> There only clean way to fix this is to add a return frame
> to the interrupted context so that it can check for cancellation
> (and other things) before returning to the threads interrupted
> context.
No way to work around this? Shouldn't the thread exit library
know which stack exactly to clean up even in the context of a
signal handler?
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
http://www.morons.org/rants/gpl-harmful.php3
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
