FYI, this is another [EMAIL PROTECTED] clone. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> with 3Com905B devices. > >> And a quick search did not reveal any major problems with the 3com cards. > > > > A "quick search" of what? Get some perspective. The "hackers" are only > > interested in cards that they use, and they all use intel for high end > stuff. > > Bill paul is too busy writing drivers for some new gigabit card to worry > > about old stuff. (note that most of his drivers are optimised for the Alpha > > and not i386...like what pct of people are using Alpha?) And there is > > apparantly no interest in fixing anything or finding out whats wrong > because > > some guy at freebsd with a 2 inch weener keeps knocking me off the > > list...they dont like criticism. I've already fixed it, so all im trying to > > do is save you a lot of time doing work thats already been done. > > >Actually, the cards are very much optimized for the i386. See the lack of > >using bus_dma for example, which is required for these cards to work on > things > >ike sparc64. Grow up and realize that not all the world is an i386. Ports > >like sparc64, powerpc, ia64, and x86-64 are being added and they are not > >exactly like the i386. I've used 3com cards (xl(4)) without any problems. > > >They are rather nice cards and Bill Paul prefers those to Intel cards since > >Intel is so nazi with its docco. :) > > >To Guret: > > >Please don't listen to Dennis. He is feeding you lies so that you will go > buy? > >his "better" ethernet drivers. He is very obnoxious and thus has been banne d > >from the lists several times. This is just another one of his silly aliases . > > We dont sell ethernet drivers, and Im not trying to "hide". Why does linux > have specific code to disable the stats under load if Im making this up? Why > can you lock up a FreeBSD 4.4 system with a 3com card at 20Kpps due to > counter overflow interrupts in about 3 seconds? > > Its too bad that pointing out bugs is deemed as being obnoxious. Maybe its > why they were complaining that linux outperforms Freebsd last week? > > Guret, I apologize for trying to help. Im sure these fellows at freebsd.org > will work painstakingly to help you find your problem. But since they are in > denial about there being anything wrong with it, you most likely are sunk. > > Try to front end your machine with a switch...the 5 cards is most likely your > problem. With each device you increase your bus contention (ie worsen the > worst case bus master scenario)...either that or get a 4 port card that is > more efficient than 5 individual cards. > > DB > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > >
Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message