On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 03:48:07AM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > There is so much "goo" around the module loading these days; there
> > > > are incursions into "mount" and all sorts of other programs that
> > > > should not know about module loading.
> > > 
> > > The kldload(2) interface alone is enough to make me cringe.  The way
> > > in which it locates a module to load appears to be black magic.
> > 
> > What part of searching a path for a matching file is "black magic"?  
> > 
> > Shells have been doing this for decades...
> 
> %%%
> /*
>  * Load /boot/kernel/procfs.ko
>  * XXX: why does this work?
>  */
> chdir("/");
> kldload("procfs");
> 
> /*
>  * Load /boot/kernel/procfs.ko
>  * XXX: why does this work?
>  */
> chdir("/");
> kldload("procfs.ko");
> 
> /*
>  * Load /boot/kernel/procfs.ko
>  */
> kldload("/boot/kernel/procfs.ko");    /* Proper interface */
> 
> /*
>  * Move procfs.ko from /boot/kernel to /tmp, then load the copy in /tmp.
>  */
> system("/bin/mv /boot/kernel/procfs.ko /tmp");
> chdir("/tmp");
> kldload("procfs.ko");                 /* XXX: this doesn't work. */
> %%%
> 
> If that's not black magic, I'd like to know what is.  I'd like to
> refer you to the kldload(2) manual, but unfortunately it doesn't
> document how kldload(2) works. :(

Okay, so it's not documented in the manual, but one look at the source
should suffice :)

As Mike said, there is a search path.  However, the current directory
is tried first.  If a file by that name is not found in the current
directory, the search path is, well, searched ;)  The search path
is available in the kern.module_path sysctl or in the output of
'kldconfig -r'.

This is similar to what shells have been doing for decades, with
the added feature of an implicit '.' at the start of the search path.

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Do you think anybody has ever had *precisely this thought* before?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to