using tcp for this is I think wrong.. Use UDP or maybe even an special protocol on IP.
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > "George V. Neville-Neil" wrote: > > Now that Luigi has put in polling support for some ethernet drivers > > I was wondering how much work it would be to make the remote kernel debugging > > run over the ethernet. I have worked on systems like this before (it's the > > reason > > I did polling network device drivers in Wind River's VxWorks) but it depends > > on a debugging system that has the ability to have its back end swapped out. > > > > Who would I talk to about how kernel debugging works at the > > lowest layers right now? Which source files should I look at first. > > You would need to also have J. Lemon's patch to get rid of NETISR, > or your TCP/IP stack will never run. Even so, his patch does not > run everything to completion (i.e. it is not the same as LRP), it > only runs it up so far, and then stops. > > You would also need to do the transmit processing manually, which, > even if you had implemented LRP, or used the LRP with the bad > license, still requires seperate processing. > > If you were to use raw ethernet datagrams, and do the retransmit > and encapsulation yourself, rather than relying on TCP for retransmit > or IP for encapsulation, then you might be able to do this (see xnet > in /etc/protocols). > > -- Terry > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
