Søren Schmidt wrote: > ... However the Serverworks ROSB4 chips is not one I > would recommend using, if you need serious ATA support on > such a board, install a Promise TX2 or later or a HPT370 or later ...
I think I've also seen you post that the Highpoint is better than the Promise. What is the "quality heirarchy" of ATA chips? Eg. I know the VIA chips have issues. Where does the CMD 649 fit in that heirarchy? Such a list (or even a list of known issues with particular chips) would be useful for specifying new machines. Thanks, Jan Mikkelsen To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
