Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 09:35:29AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > : I think it is still there (and my draft copy says the same thing). > > : I was thinking about the original C89 standard which does not allow it > > : (and does not allow incomplete array types in structs). Guess I should > > : have said which standard I was referring to. > > > > struct foo { > > char array[0]; > > }; > > > > appears to be in C-99 but not C-89. If you have the draft, so far the > > only thing I've noticed that is different between the draft and the > > final standard is that there's 10-15 more footnotes in the final > > standard than were in the final draft. > > > > Warner > > Are you sure that is in C99? > What is allowed in C99 (but wasn't in C89) is > > struct foo > { > int b; > char array[]; > }; > > Note that you must have a 'normal' field before the incomplete array. > > I don't think > char array[0]; > is allowed in either of C89 or C99.
Correct on all counts. I'll cite the letter of the law from C99 if anybody really cares. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message