On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> > Several times slower! The point is that writing less data performs
> > worse. So I call it weird.
>
> Huh? You originally said:
>
> > (1) Write each block fully and sequentially, ie. 8192 bytes.
> >
> > (2) I still write these blocks sequentially, but for each block I only
> > write part of it.
> ...
> > I find out the the performance of (2) is several times better than the
> > performance of (1). Can anyone explain to me why this is the case?
>
> If (2) is better than (1), then writing *less* data is faster. Which is
> it, now?
>
Um yeah that is what all my suggestions were based on..
> Lars
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
