On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 01:20:51PM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > b) other options were set at compile time > > --> Why dont change to the same in the port? > > Leads it to a broken world? > > If the only difference is the lost of binary compatibility, > > i would say, ok... do it now and we'll need to compile > > or ports... > Pretty much each and every C++ binary and shared library will have to be > recompiled. Massive binary compatibility breakage is not an option for > -STABLE, one can hope.
No it is not an option for -STABLE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
