On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 10:34:07 +0200 (CEST) Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> On  1 Apr, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> 
> >> > my first tries for the patched include files can be found here:
> >> > <http://corecode.ath.cx/~corecode/stuff/icc-patched-includes-0.1.tgz>
> >> 
> >> We should either fix the base system, or ${IA32ROOT}/includes/.
> > 
> > i'd really like to, but the headers from the base system are just not
> > standard conformant enough.
> > the headers coming with icc just don't fit our libs; they are specially
> > crafted for use with redhat linux 7.1 :/
> > i already tried to fix these, but our implementation of the multibyte
> > functions won't let this be an easy task (if it ever can be solved):
> 
> Do you have test cases where the removal of icc's includes and the use
> of "-X -I/usr/include/g++ -I/usr/include" fails?

yes. just as simple as that:

#include <string>
std::string test;

it also fails after fixing the wchar_t thingy.
the headers from the base system don't use namespaces correctly...

i've tried both 2.95.3 and 3.0.4 headers, look at
<http://www/~corecode/stuff/patch-include.3.0.4.tgz> and .2.95.3.tgz for
the results; both still don't compile.

to test these, just prepend this one include directory to the search
path and use the appropriate g++ include dir.

cheerz
  simon

ps: i hope we will get this done some time ;]

-- 
/"\   http://corecode.ath.cx/
\ /
 \     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/ \  Against HTML Mail and News

Attachment: msg33253/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to