In message <E1450DFD283DD61184900002A5F0032356BD7C@STLABCEXG024>, "Alton, Matth ew" writes: >Are there any plans to expand the procfs implementation to provide an >interface that is more in line with the implementations on Unixware, >Solaris and AIX? I've been writing a simple debugger that would be >portable among those three platforms, and others, but it is based >completely on the procfs interface, and I've come to find out the >procfs implementation on FreeBSD and Linux are (aside from being >completely different from each other) completely different than what's >been done on AIX, Solaris and Unixware.
We are working very hard to make procfs optional in FreeBSD for a number of reasons. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
