Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Bogdan TARU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On 10 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > In my humble opinion, Solaris (and every other *nix) is broken in > > > this > > > respect, and *BSD is correct. > > Except for OpenBDS. No NetBDS machine available, maybe some of you > > could > > try it on one as well? > > I don't know of any "OpenBDS" or "NetBDS", but NetBSD has the same > semantics as FreeBSD:
For ls, so do linux, HP-UX, and Digital Unix 4.0 -- I just checked. It does seem the more sensible and useful behaviour. However, without the -l flag the symlink is followed regardless of the trailing / >From Digital Unix: rs> mkdir foo rs> mkdir foo/bar rs> ln -s foo baz rs> ls baz bar/ rs> ls baz/ bar/ rs> ls -l baz lrwxrwxrwx 1 rsidd users 3 Apr 10 20:43 baz@ -> foo/ rs> ls -l baz/ total 1 drwxr-xr-x 2 rsidd users 512 Apr 10 20:43 bar/ With rm baz/ it's different: linux doesn't follow the symlink, it removes "baz". Digital and HP-UX follow the symlink. All three remove the symlink if specified without the trailing / - Rahul To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
