On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 12:26:14PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Life support systems require formal proofs of correctness for code; > since neither Linux nor FreeBSD is formally correct, in total, you > would need to be insane to deplaoy either of them as, for example, > a part of an air traffic control system.
I suspect that's a bad example, or that you mean an embedded aircraft control system. Ron Reisman and James Murphy gave a fine invited talk at USENIX 02 (http://www.usenix.org/events/usenix02/tech/#11am) about the growing number of UNIX components in the US ATC system. I reject the conclusion that the FAA is collectively insane for that reason. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ted Faber [EMAIL PROTECTED] USC/ISI Computer Scientist http://www.isi.edu/~faber (310) 448-9190 PGP Keys: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
msg37328/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
