On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:33:01AM -0800, David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Yes, that is also what I meant. We now have a swapoff() system call that > > does all the work itself. > > > > My idea was to split that up: > > > > /* turn of swap device */ > > static int swapoff_one(struct swdevt *sp) > > { > > /* Do all things that we don't want to know about outside this function > > */ > > } > > > > /* turn off all swap devices */ > > int swapoff_all() > > { > > int index; > > struct swdevt *sp; > > > > for (sp = swdevt, index = 0; index < nswdev; index++, sp++) > > swapoff_one(sp); > > } > > > > So the swapoff() system call would call swapoff_one() and my code in > > kern/kern_swsuspend.c would call swapoff_all(). > > See swapoff(8), in particular the -a flag.
I'm aware of that, but imho it doesn't suite my purpose. Are you strongly against having such code inside the kernel? Mark -- Mark Santcroos RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/ New Projects Group/TTM To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message