On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 04:43:46PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
+> > Did we somehow break acct(2), or is that somehow inadequate to the task?  It 
+> > should be ideal for what Julian's customer wants, I would think.  See also 
+> > acct(5), sa(8) and accton(8).
+> 
+> Acct doesn't give the arguments of the commands
+> 
+> rexec (as pointed out earlier in this thread) does exactly what I want.
[...]

For logging only, I recommend light-wegiht rexec - lrexec.

It can be found at:

        http://garage.freebsd.pl/lrexec.tbz (actual CVS snapshot)
        http://garage.freebsd.pl/lrexec.README
or at:
        http://cerber.sourceforge.net/projects/cerber
to.
And it's better documented atm.

-- 
Pawel Jakub Dawidek
UNIX Systems Administrator
http://garage.freebsd.pl
Am I Evil? Yes, I Am.

Attachment: msg39922/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to