On 26-Feb-2003 Bob Bishop wrote: > Hi, > > At 22:01 25/2/03, Robert Watson wrote: >>[...] >>I would oppose simply enabling the current CANSIGNAL check -- it >>has serious problems. On the other hand, putting in a refined check >>sounds reasonable and I'd be happy to review such a patch. Although the >>code from 5.x won't instantly work with 4.x without substantial >>modification, it might make a good starting point. > > OK, so what's the score with the patch at the end of the kern/40611 audit > trail? Thanks
I think that we would prefer that someone fix the CANSIGNAL check as Robert desires and then enable it. The patch in the PR basically allows one to get information about any process even if you aren't root, so I think that may be a bad idea. -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
