On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:50:59PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: +> Because you told make(1) to by virtue of including bsd.prog.mk +> +> OBJS is derived from SRCS by replacing the extension. If SRCS +> contains foo/bar.c, OBJS will contain foo/bar.o...
Yes, but take a look on compilation process. When file is compilated '-o' isn't specified (gcc -c test/tst.c), but when executable file is produced, gcc looks for tst.o in test directory (gcc -o tst test/tst.o). And IMHO if gcc want to look for objects somewhere it should put them there, so: gcc -o test/tst.o -c test/tst.c. Sometimes it is hard to change. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX Systems Programmer/Administrator http://garage.freebsd.pl Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://cerber.sourceforge.net
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
