It seems Lukas Ertl wrote: > > If there's a good reason ccd(4) is harder to fix than geom_mirror, then > > you might want to talk to phk about rewriting geom_ccd based on > > geom_mirror. I believe scottl and phk have plans to fix raidframe, > > though, which would address a lot of the present limitations. > > I haven't used ccd or raidframe before, and vinum is still a lot of > 'voodoo'. I just wanted to play around and do something useful; > furthermore I learned a real lot about GEOM internals.
HMM!! Maybe we could end up doing something usefull here for a change... I would *love* GEOM to grow RAIDX support, so that I just needed to write the read/write RAID config routines to support Promise/HPT/xxx RAID's. That would also mean we could end the miserable lifes of ataraid/vinum/raidframe, which would be a reallygood thing (tm). But I'll bet this sensible a solution to the RAID problems will drown in religion/warfare/bikesheds between those involded in the above RAID solutions and the usual whiners/armchair generals. But count me in for this!! -Søren _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
