Hi!
Is the following patch to the emulators/rtc port right? qemu
(see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=67506) expects it
to send SIGIO and i'm not that good at kernel hacking to know
if the following is correct... it seems to work for me tho.
(Anyone interested in helping fixing the other problems mentioned
in the pkg-descr is welcome also. This looks like a coool project...)
Index: files/rtc.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/rtc/files/rtc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.15 rtc.c
--- files/rtc.c 13 Mar 2004 21:20:03 -0000 1.15
+++ files/rtc.c 1 Jun 2004 15:46:19 -0000
@@ -74,6 +74,11 @@
int opened:1;
int enabled:1;
} flags;
+#if __FreeBSD_version >= 500023
+ struct thread *sproc;
+#else
+ struct proc *sproc;
+#endif
struct callout rtc_handle;
struct timespec lasttime;
struct selinfo sip;
@@ -207,6 +212,7 @@
if (sc->var.flags.opened)
return (EBUSY);
+ sc->var.sproc = NULL;
sc->var.flags.opened = 1;
return 0;
@@ -222,6 +228,7 @@
struct rtc_softc *sc = (struct rtc_softc *) dev->si_drv1;
rtc_detach(dev, sc);
+ sc->var.sproc = NULL;
sc->var.flags.opened = 0;
return 0;
}
@@ -261,6 +268,7 @@
break;
case RTCIO_PIE_ON:
sc->var.flags.enabled = 1;
+ sc->var.sproc = p;
DLog(Linfo, "Enable interrupts");
break;
default:
@@ -394,6 +402,7 @@
return;
/* Wakeup sleepers */
sc->var.woken++;
+ psignal(sc->var.sproc, SIGIO);
selwakeup(&sc->var.sip);
wakeup(&sc->var.rtc_ident);
Thanks,
Juergen
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
