On Fri, Sep 17, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >If we put your patch in but as a KASSERT then anyone ruinning with > >debugging turned on > >(and no-one in their right mind would write a kernel module without > >turning on debugging, right?) > >will immediatly find the problem. > > > > What you can't understand is that having a limit about arguments is wrong > (it's not documented too). Why limiting to 8 and not to 20? or 65? i don't > understand... > In my opinion a patch would be better (and even quicker respect KASSERT).
Hey, until recently, Linux on i386 required a special case for any syscall with over 4 arguments. Supporting 8 makes us twice as good! ;-) _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"