On 2004-10-05 10:37, Chris Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think you just nailed it on the head right here... if you say "rm > -rf /" you probably mean it, but if you say "rm -rf / foo" you > probably oopsed (pretty good bet, since rm / makes asking to rm foo > redundant). How about checking if there is more than one argument, > and if one of those arguments is "/", fail. If there is only one > argument, even if it is "/", assume the user knows what he is doing > and proceed normally.
I no longer have any interest in working towards any sort of change related to this thread. Please do not Cc: me when replying. Thanks, Giorgos _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
