> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 15:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I'll try it out; meanwhile, I've discovered the sysctl to change this
>> manually. I've checked it works by trying to compile something at the
>> lowest CPU clock speed. It was slow to hell :-)
>
> That's probably clock throttling which is different..

Yes, the sysctl included "throttle". As I said, I'm new to the laptop
world.. Is the power saving difference a lot if I just throttle the clock,
instead of using enhanced speed step?

>
> [Enhanced] Speed Step reduces the clock speed and the CPU core voltage..
> clock
> throttling just idles the CPU for a certain proportion of the time. If you
> want slow try forcing them both to the slowest speed.. Pentium-M 75Mhz :)
>
>> > Any chance there is a new BIOS available for that system?
>>
>> A quick googling session brought up nothing.
>
> How about say, checking the makers web site?
>

I also did, nothing :-P

>> > No.. If I try and look at a non existent battery slot it says 'device
>> not
>> > configured' so maybe it thinks you have no batteries for some strange
>> > reason.
>>
>> I've installed klaptop and it shows battery as -1 and 'not charging'
>> acpiconf -i[0-9] didn't do any good either :/
>
> Without ACPI support being able to read your battery status no userland
> program will work.
>
> Your dmesg shows acpi_cmbat entries, ie
> acpi_cmbat0: <Control Method Battery> on acpi0
> acpi_cmbat1: <Control Method Battery> on acpi0
>
> which I think is pretty fundamental to being able to read battery status
> ;)
>

Yesterday I googled a bit for my laptop name+linux and I found a post from
a guy who had the same exact problem under Linux. He had /proc/acpi but no
/proc/acpi/battery.

I know battery status can be seen, as the laptop shipped with win XP home,
which I promptly got rid of, but I installed a game there to see how many
FPS I'd get playing with the laptop. So I still messed around with it
(windows) for around 35 minutes, and could see the little battery icon
discharging.

If the acpi_cmbat0/1 shows up on dmesg, what could be wrong? Perhaps this
ACPI implementation is a bit weird and I should send a copy of my asl to
freebsd-acpi ?


>
> --
> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
> "The nice thing about standards is that there
> are so many of them to choose from."
>   -- Andrew Tanenbaum
> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
>


_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to