Re: process checkpoint restore facility now in DragonFly BSD

[Peter Kieser]

I have no problem with bringing up the discussion of process 
checkpointing on FreeBSD, what I _DO_ have a problem with is all this 
cruft about DF on the list all the time. We keep getting the, "DragonFly 
does it this way" or "DragonFly has this and we don't" on the 
freebsd-hackers mailing list, and I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one 
annoyed about it.

Again, I have no problem with bringing up the process checkpointing, I 
have a problem with people saying "DragonFly has this" _all_ the time; 
if I wanted to hear about DF's development path I would be subscribed to 
their mailing lists.

--Peter
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 10:00:29PM -0800, Peter Kieser wrote:
 

freebsd-hackers != DragonFly BSD Mailing List...
--Peter
   

I hate to jump on people like this, but I think you are missing the point
here. Process checkpointing is a desirable feature for things like
suspend-to-disk support for laptops, etc. Whether the code originated
in DragonflyBSD or WhateverBSD isn't really the point, if people are
happy to discuss implementation here, please let them -- it's very
desirable for FreeBSD.
BMS
 

_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"