On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:44:48 -0800, David Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks, I was wondering why the kernel side iconv support is so incomplete. I mean, only XLAT and XLAT 16 converters are implemented. Is there any reason that we don't want to put all converters into the kernel (e.g. too large)? Or just no one wrote it? I think the iconv support is really important in filename conversion in some file systems, especially for non-English users. A fully functional iconv will be good for many people.
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-july-2004-dec-2004.html#Improved-Multibyte/Wide-Character-Support
David
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
