In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Thor Lancelot Simon writes: >I could not disagree more. When it comes to nonstandard homebrewed >cryptosystems foisted off on unsuspecting users with a bundle of >claims of algorithm strength that they're not competent to evaluate >for themselves, we do not need more ideas, nor more people trying >out ideas; we need less. > >Standard, widely analyzed cryptographic algorithms are good.
s/ are good/, when applied with caution and wisdom, are good/ :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
