In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hans Petter Selasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sunday 21 August 2005 01:12, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: >
: > Hans Petter Selasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : On Saturday 20 August 2005 10:18, Mike Silbersack wrote:
: > : > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
: > : > > Flash is nice but it has some issues. Atleast dropping it isn't one!
: > : > >
: > : > > Doug A.
: > : >
: > : > I'd be really happy if I could get a USB flash drive to last more than
: > : > 8 months. Luckily, I started weekly backups after the first failure.
: > : > That helped a lot when the second failure happened.
: > :
: > : Flash drives does usually not last more than 10000 writes, per bit, from
: > : what I know. Probably you need some kind of special file-system that
: > : moves the files around as the write quoute gets used up! Eventually the
: > : size of the disk will reach zero, and you have to move the files
: > : elsewhere :-) But this is probably off topic.
: >
: > Actually, 10,000 writes per bit is one or two orders of magnitude too
: > low these days. It was more typical for the Linear Flash PCMCIA cards
: > from 10 years ago. Today, typically flash devices are good for more
: > like 100,000 or 500,000 writes per cell, and all the fobs you'd buy
: > these days have built-in wear averaging. I've tried three times now
: > to wear out a flash by writing an incrementing counter to a single
: > location only to give up after weeks of hammering due to external
: > factors (power failure, network failure, etc).
:
: Are you sure that the flash drive is not caching the writes in RAM?
Yes. I'm 100% positive. These devices do not have RAM.
Warner
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
