On Tuesday 20 December 2005 10:58 am, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 10:29:27AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > The other concern is does this force the entire crunch to require a > > working rtld now? If so, that would mean that this wouldn't be > > appropriate for something such as /rescue. If there were a way to > > statically link rtld into the crunch itself that would probably be ideal, > > but I'm not sure that is possible. > > No, just the dynamic bits require rtld.
So you can still run /foo without rtld being present if foo doesn't need dlopen, etc.? It looks like you link the crunch with -o dynamic, so isn't the kernel going to complain when you try to exec it that it can't find rtld if rtld is missing? (Think about /rescue if your rtld is hosed and/or missing.) -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"