Jacques Marneweck wrote:
Danny Braniss wrote:

Daichi GOTO wrote:
All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions
and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :)

OK.  How about a merge?

I'd really like to see this in 6-STABLE.

Regards,

Jan Mikkelsen.

just a 'me too'. I've been running with the patch(under 6.1) and it's definitely
better than the panics with the unpatched version. in other words,
IMHO, it does not break anything, and it actualy fixes somethings.

danny

Any ETA to when we can see this merged into 6.1 and 5.5?

Regards
--jm


Since it's not in HEAD yet, it's pretty improbable that it'll get into
5.5 and 6.1.  It would be nice to get it in for 6.2 though.

Scott

_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to