On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:57:48AM +1000, Tony Maher wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 02:48:51AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > >>On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 07:22:27PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> > >>>On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:48:44PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> > >>>> I tried out FreeBSD 6.0 (sorry, I copied just part or > >>>> uname -a and I got something like "LINUX 2.4.2 FreeBSD 6.0 - > >>>>Release #0: Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/LINUX") > >>> > >>>No you didn't, since no version of FreeBSD reports itself as LINUX > >>>from uname. > >> > >>Unless uname is a Linux binary. > > > > > > FreeBSD doesn't ship uname as a Linux binary either :-) > > > > Kris > /compat/linux/bin/uname -a > Linux karma.internal 2.4.2 FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Apr 4 22:24:50 EST > 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Right, and that's not the FreeBSD uname, it's the redhat (or whatever) uname. Kris
pgpuyPskxSkpo.pgp
Description: PGP signature