On Wed, 3 May 2006, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
Daniel Eischen wrote:
You are entirely confused. You should go back to the POSIX standard
and get Dave Butenhof's Programming with POSIX Threads book.
[..]
You are right. All is clear now, i re-read the link twice and played with
sigprocmask vs. pthread_sigmask. It's clear now, also with the help of:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/sigprocmask.html
Note that sigprocmask() and pthread_sigprocmask() are equivalent. I
don't even think pthread_sigprocmask() is in the standard any longer
(it used to be in an older version of the standard). New applications
should be using sigprocmask().
--
DE
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
