Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
On 6/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> I realize how hard getting write support for one of those is, for
> certain. You'd still have to go through the labor with ZFS though,
> unless you are talking about read-only support for it. I don't know
> much about licensing stuff...
>
Well ... one thing we can't underestimate is that SUN would actually like
a
port (noticed all the good PR for them Dtrace for FreeBSD has brought?)
and is
willing to cooperate: not coding but at least saying what to do,
explaining the
code, etc. Reiser doesn't care and SGI is clearly busy with other
problems
and
hasn't really cared at all either.
cheers,
Pedro.
> > NetBSD has a Journalling Google SoC, definitely interesting if they
get
> far.
> >
> > Pedro.
>
> We did too last year, but it didn't complete. I think Scott Long is
> back looking at it again (I've seen some hints of life in the p4 repo).
>
>
> Eric
>
I vote for ZFS as well... The argument by Pedro are more than true..and
also ZFS is an incredible filesystem. It would be a SUPER SUPER step to
have
it on FreeBSD.
Iantcho
Agreed it would be. I'd love to see it (I'm an advocate for as many
filesystems available as possible actually).
So, the real question is, who's going to volunteer to start actually
porting it?
Eric
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology
Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
