In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: >> --- systm.h.orig Mon Jul 10 05:42:58 2006
: >> +++ systm.h Mon Jul 10 18:44:01 2006
: >> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@
: >> int suword16(void *base, int word);
: >> int suword32(void *base, int32_t word);
: >> int suword64(void *base, int64_t word);
: >> -intptr_t casuptr(intptr_t *p, intptr_t old, intptr_t new);
: >> +intptr_t casuptr(intptr_t *p, intptr_t old, intptr_t __new__);
: >
: > This is a namespace violation. A simpler solution is to leave out
: > argument names entirely.
:
: If the code style permits, I agree with you.
:
: GCC support library usually uses "namespace" to add various prefixes
: to its built-in functions/variables in order to avoid conflicts against
: user code. In ELF binary file, built-in functions/variables' names are
: much longer than "__new__". See files in
: /usr/src/contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++/.
__new__ is bogus. _new if you must.
Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
