On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:11:13 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned: > I think it is better not to rely on that side effect. It > isn't well documented and might change without notice in > the future.
Thanks for explanation. I suppose, however, that .for behavior could be used rather safely for it's well documented in make(1). According to this manpage, it's not a side effect - .for loops always unrolled and variable substitutions occurs. Thanks for all answers! -- Stanislav Sedov MBSD labs, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Россия, Москва http://mbsd.msk.ru -------------------------------------------------------------------- If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts. -- A. Einstein -------------------------------------------------------------------- PGP fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
