On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:18:47PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote:
> The last of these required new kernel changes, including an MD component.
> I've tested the MD parts only on i386, although I have quick hacks at what
> they should look like on amd64, arm, powerpc, sparc64, sun4v. I don't
> promise these compile or work, but they might do.
The kernel build didn't work on AMD64...
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -g -Wall
-Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign
-fformat-extensions -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq
-D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common
-finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param
large-function-growth=1000 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel
-mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow
-msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror
/usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/db_trace.c
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/db_trace.c: In function 'stack_save_td':
/usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/db_trace.c:535: warning: type defaults to 'int' in
declaration of 'rbp'
/usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/db_trace.c:537: warning: implicit declaration of
function 'TD_IS_SWWAPPED'
/usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/db_trace.c:537: warning: nested extern declaration of
'TD_IS_SWWAPPED'
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src %
Here's an updated patch to sys/amd64/amd64/db_trace.c (it's a diff
against revision 1.81). It changes "register rbp" to be "register_t
rbp" and fixes the extra "W" in TD_IS_SWAPPED. The kernel built fine
after these changes. I'll test it out tomorrow.
--- sys/amd64/amd64/db_trace.c.orig 2007-11-15 17:00:56.000000000 -0500
+++ sys/amd64/amd64/db_trace.c 2007-11-27 22:59:29.000000000 -0500
@@ -505,15 +505,13 @@
ctx->pcb_rip, count));
}
-void
-stack_save(struct stack *st)
+static void
+stack_capture(struct stack *st, register_t rbp)
{
struct amd64_frame *frame;
vm_offset_t callpc;
- register_t rbp;
stack_zero(st);
- __asm __volatile("movq %%rbp,%0" : "=r" (rbp));
frame = (struct amd64_frame *)rbp;
while (1) {
if (!INKERNEL((long)frame))
@@ -531,6 +529,29 @@
}
}
+void
+stack_save_td(struct stack *st, struct thread *td)
+{
+ register_t rbp;
+
+ if (TD_IS_SWAPPED(td))
+ panic("stack_save_td: swapped");
+ if (TD_IS_RUNNING(td))
+ panic("stack_save_td: running");
+
+ rbp = td->td_pcb->pcb_rbp;
+ stack_capture(st, rbp);
+}
+
+void
+stack_save(struct stack *st)
+{
+ register_t rbp;
+
+ __asm __volatile("movq %%rbp,%0" : "=r" (rbp));
+ stack_capture(st, rbp);
+}
+
int
amd64_set_watch(watchnum, watchaddr, size, access, d)
int watchnum;
> I think procstat(1) is getting a lot closer to commitable state for
> 8-CURRENT, but further feedback would be most welcome (including reports of
> success on non-i386 architectures, and possibly patches to fix them). For
> FreeBSD developers with P4 access, you can also check out
Thank you for this. I think procstat(1) is going to be very useful.
-- WXS
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
