On 2008-02-27 10:31, David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:33:41PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2008-02-23 16:48, "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> This knee-jerk reaction against gnu find functionality baffles me. >>> The changes are trivial and make FreeBSD more compatible. It is such >>> an obvious no-brainer that I frankly didn't expect anybody to bat an >>> eye. >> >> So should I expect similar knee-jerk reactions to the just committed >> `finger compatibility' option to implement du -l for hardlinks? > > You added a new useful feature - and you based the option letter on > prior-art (and resumable doen't conflict with POSIX).
Fortunately, no, there is no conflict :-) The du(1) manpage at the online version of SUSv3 <http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/utilities/du.html> mentions only the -L option, for dereferencing symlinks. I should have probably mentioned this in the commit log, now that I think about it. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
